Glucosamine and Chondroitin for Aromatase Inhibitor-Induced Joint Pain

glucosamine chondroitin osteoarthritis back pain spinal stenosis shark cartilageA new study presented at a conference last month revealed data supporting the use of glucosamine and chondroitin for joint pain and stiffness connected to osteoarthritis and aromatase inhibitors. Osteoarthritis in the neck can lead to pinched nerves, subluxation, and even spinal cord compression, causing neck pain and stiffness, as well as headaches, and even paraesthesia, numbness, and weakness in the limbs. Aromatase inhibitors may contribute to neck pain via this mechanism, but the drugs are increasingly used to improve survival times in breast cancer patients. Discussing their findings at the 8th International Conference of the Society for Integrative Oncology, researchers from Columbia University talked about the adverse effects on joint health in breast cancer patients taking aromatase inhibitors to manage their cancer. Joint pain and stiffness experienced by these women appeared to be relieved by the concomitant use of glucosamine and chondroitin, although the symptoms remained largely unresponsive to conventional pain medication.

Joint Pain from Aromatase Inhibitors

The incidence of joint problems and musculoskeletal issues in those women prescribed aromatase inhibitors is often blamed for the low adherence to such therapy. Findings ways to minimise joint pain in those taking aromatase inhibitors could help more women attain the survival benefits conferred by the drugs. Unfortunately, other studies have not found the supplements effect in the general population for treating osteoarthritis symptoms, with a 2006 meta-analysis looking at the use of glucosamine and chondroitin over a six-month period. A previous meta-analysis, in 2002, suggested that the supplements might effectively relieve disability and pain in osteoarthritis. The benefits are usually described in the knee joints, ankles, and wrists, rather than in the spine however, and there are those who consider it unlikely that neck pain or back pain could be relieved by using glucosamine and chondroitin simply because the low levels of blood circulating to the spine would preclude significant movement of the substances to the region.

Glucosamine and Chondroitin Study Details

The researchers presenting their data at this conference were almost stopped in their tracks by the negative results of the 2006 meta-analysis. Looking at a subgroup suffering from moderate to severe pain at the start of the studies revealed that there were some patients who did appear to benefit from the supplement regime however, and so Dr Greenlee and colleagues persisted with their own research, sponsored by AstraZeneca. Their study is a Phase II single-group trial of postmenopausal women with breast cancer stage I to III. All the patients had been taking aromatase inhibitors for three months or more prior to the study’s commencement and all reported joint pain higher than 4 on a 10 point visual analog scale. Those with pre-existing osteoarthritis were included if their pain had worsened after initiating treatment with aromatase inhibitors.

Problems with the Study

This study only looked at a small number of patients, with just 37 completing the trial over twelve weeks. However, the study group was quite diverse, with 40% of patients white, and 40% Hispanic, and with a median age of 61, possibly making the results more likely to be applicable to a larger number of women. Most of the women were overweight however, which is a known factor for joint pain as excess stress is put on the musculoskeletal system to support the extra weight.

How Much Glucosamine to Take for Joint Pain

The doses used in this study were 1500mg/day of glucosamine and 1200mg/day of chondroitin, and the researchers evaluated the patients every six weeks in the clinic. The main assessment method used was the Outcome Measure in Rheumatology Clinical Trials and Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARS) criteria, although the researchers themselves have questioned the appropriateness of such a measurement following the trial’s conclusion. Other evaluations were completed, including the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) Index, Modified Score for the Assessment and Quantification of Chronic Rheumatoid Affections of the Hands (M-SACRAH), and Brief Pain/Stiffness Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF). The primary end-point assessment method was chosen so as to allow the researchers to compare their results with the 2006 meta-analysis using the same experimental assessment.

Functional Improvements with Glucosamine and Chondroitin

glucosamine chondroitin shellfish back pain spinal stenosisAlthough the patients reported reductions in pain and stiffness in the hips and knees at 12 and 24 weeks, along with improved function, other joints were also positively affected during the study, including the wrists and hands. Grip strength improved during the trial, and between 35% and 50% of the patients reported pain and stiffness reduction overall. Commonly reported adverse effects included headache, dyspepsia, and nausea, although no severe adverse effects of taking glucosamine and chondroitin were noted. The researchers thus concluded that the regime was safe for women with breast cancer, and may be beneficial in those experiencing aromatase-inhibitor-induced joint pain. The low negative effect of the supplement regime makes the drugs appear more favorable when accounting for their lower effect compared to other interventions that have higher risks of adverse reactions. In cases where aromatase inhibitors are thought to be causing or exacerbating osteoarthritis and neck pain, glucosamine and chondroitin could offer relief it seems.


8th International Conference of the Society for Integrative Oncology: Abstract 4. Presented November 10, 2011.

Stuber K, Sajko S, Kristmanson K., (2011), Efficacy of glucosamine, chondroitin, and methylsulfonylmethane for spinal degenerative joint disease and degenerative disc disease: a systematic review. J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2011 Mar;55(1):47-55.

Ruane, R., Griffiths, P., (2002), Glucosamine therapy compared to ibuprofen for joint pain, British Journal of Community Nursing, Vol.7, no.3, pp.148-52. PMID 11904551

Walsh, J.A.L., O’Neill, C.W., Lotz, J.C., (2007), Glucosamine HCl alters production of inflammatory mediators by rat intervertebral disc cells in vitro, The Spine Journal, Vol.7, no.5, pp.601-608.

Phillipi, A.F., Leffler, C.T., Leffler, S.G., Mosure, J.D.C., Kim, P.D., (1999), Glucosamine, chondroitin and manganese for degenerative joint disease of the knee or low back: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study, Military Medicine, Vol.64, no.2, pp.85–91.

Deal, C.L., (1999), Neutraceuticals as Therapeutic Agents in Osteoarthritis, Rheumatic Disease Clinics of North America, pp.379-395.

Forsyth, R., Brigden, C., Northrop, A., (2006), Double blind investigation of the effects of oral supplementation of combined glucosamine hydrochloride (GHCL) and chondroitin sulphate (CS) on stride characteristics of veteran horses, Equine Veterinary Journal, Vol.36S, pp.622-5. PMID 17402494

2278 replies
  1. says:

    I’m really enjoying the theme/design of your blog. Do you ever run into any internet browser
    compatibility issues? A number of my blog readers have complained about my website not
    working correctly in Explorer but looks great
    in Chrome. Do you have any ideas to help fix this

  2. says:

    Hi! Quick question that’s completely off topic.

    Do you know how to make your site mobile friendly? My weblog looks weird when browsing from my
    apple iphone. I’m trying to find a theme or plugin that might be able to resolve this issue.
    If you have any recommendations, please share.
    Appreciate it!

  3. says:

    You really make it seem so easy with your presentation but
    I find this matter to be actually something which I think I would never understand.

    It seems too complex and very broad for me. I’m looking forward for your next
    post, I will try to get the hang of it!

  4. says:

    Pretty component to content. I simply stumbled
    upon your weblog and in accession capital to say that I get actually loved account your
    blog posts. Anyway I will be subscribing in your augment or even I fulfillment you access consistently rapidly.

  5. says:

    Good day! I know this is somewhat off topic but I was wondering if you knew where I could get
    a captcha plugin for my comment form? I’m using the same
    blog platform as yours and I’m having problems finding one?
    Thanks a lot!

  6. says:

    An intriguing discussion is worth comment. I believe that you should write more
    about this issue, it may not be a taboo matter but typically people do not talk about
    such topics. To the next! Kind regards!!

  7. says:

    Hey There. I found your blog using msn. That is a very smartly written article.
    I will be sure to bookmark it and come back to read extra of your helpful information. Thank
    you for the post. I will certainly return.

  8. Nen
    Nen says:

    Gambling, though widespread in the United States, is subject to legislation at both the state and federal level that bans it from certain areas, limits the means and types of gambling, and otherwise regulates the activity. A statewide survey found 48 percent of Pennsylvania residents supported legalized riverboat gambling and just 38 percent were opposed. However, Then-Governor Robert P. Casey claimed to be opposed to gambling and threatened to veto any gambling legislation passed in the state. Further, one participating in such social game cannot directly or indirectly participate in “professional gambling,” which is defined in Colorado law as “aiding or inducing another to engage in gambling, with the intent to derive a profit therefrom.” This generally means that no one other than the players can profit from the game or activity in any manner. The profit does not need to be direct profit. Colorado law defines “profit” as any “realized or unrealized benefit, direct or indirect, including without limitation benefits from proprietorship, management, or unequal advantage in a series of transactions.” As all smart online blackjack players know, no deposit bonuses are not free money that you can withdraw at will. Online blackjack casinos give away these bonuses because they want you to wager real money on their blackjack games. This bonus is similar to the free spins no deposit but gives out cash bonus instead. New players have to sign up and fulfill all the registration requirements to be given the casino bonus. Compared to the free spins offer, the range of casino games the bonus can be redeemed is bigger. What differs is the execution and number of games applicable to the bonus. This is a good option for players who enjoy playing slot games as well as table games. The majority of casinos ask for wagering after betting several times before the withdrawal. However, some ask for lower wagers and open up the proceeds to use on another casino game.

  9. says:

    Pretty section of content. I simply stumbled upon your blog and in accession capital to claim that I acquire in fact
    loved account your weblog posts. Any way I’ll be subscribing on your feeds and even I success you access persistently quickly.

  10. says:

    Just desire to say your article is as astonishing. The clarity in your post is simply nice and
    i can assume you’re an expert on this subject.

    Fine with your permission let me to grab your feed to
    keep up to date with forthcoming post. Thanks
    a million and please carry on the enjoyable work.